Endermologie vs CoolSculpting, cavitation and Emsculpt
They work on different layers. Endermologie works on the look of the skin and is FDA-cleared to temporarily reduce the appearance of cellulite. CoolSculpting freezes fat cells. Cavitation and other ultrasound devices aim sound at fat. Emsculpt makes muscles contract. Karisma Esthetics offers Endermologie, at $150 a session after a $160 first visit, and ultrasonic cavitation inside Karisma Contour & Define. It does not offer CoolSculpting or Emsculpt.
Published · Written by Kay Woodson · Results vary.What does each treatment target?
From the FDA files and the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD), checked October 29, 2026.
| Endermologie | CoolSculpting | Cavitation and other ultrasound | Emsculpt | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main target | The look of skin with cellulite | A bulge of fat | Fat | Muscle |
| How | Suction plus motorized rollers | Controlled cold | Sound waves | An electromagnetic field that triggers muscle contractions |
| FDA file | 510(k) K990445, January 18, 2000 | First authorized August 24, 2010 (DEN090002). Current Elite system K233732, September 12, 2024 | No 510(k) with "cavitation" in the device name. Example of a cleared ultrasound fat device: UltraShape, K141708, October 6, 2014 | BTL 799-2, K180813, June 14, 2018, and 799-2T, K182106, October 23, 2018 |
| Cleared wording | "Temporarily reduces the appearance of cellulite" | Breakdown of fat on the upper arm, bra and back fat, banana roll, thigh, abdomen and flank, for a BMI of 30 or less | UltraShape: non-invasive reduction in abdominal circumference | Abdominal tone; strengthening, toning and firming of buttocks and thighs; arms added in the second file |
| For cellulite, per the AAD | Some evidence; temporary | Not recommended for cellulite | Ultrasound: too early to tell | Not covered in the AAD's cellulite summary |
| At Karisma | Yes. $160 first visit, $150 after, $45 suit | Not offered | Yes, inside Contour & Define, $225 | Not offered |
BTL announced in July 2019 that Emsculpt was cleared for arms and calves, building on its abdomen, buttock and thigh clearances. The BTL 799-2 files above carry those same indications.
Which layer do you want to change?
Most mix-ups come from treating three different problems as one. Dimpling is a skin-surface look, shaped by the fibrous bands that tie skin to the tissue below. A bulge is a pocket of fat. Softness or a lack of definition is often about muscle. Each device in the table aims at one of those, and none of them handles all three.
So before comparing prices or brands, stand in front of a mirror and name what bothers you. If it is dimpling on the thighs or buttocks, the fat and muscle devices are not built for it. If it is a pocket of fat that stays despite diet and exercise, a cellulite treatment will not shrink it.
CoolSculpting: what the 2024 label adds
The current CoolSculpting Elite clearance is specific. It covers cold-assisted breakdown of fat on the upper arm, bra fat, back fat, banana roll, thigh, abdomen and flank in people with a body mass index of 30 or less, and under the chin and jaw up to a BMI of 46.2. The same file says it is intended to affect the look of visible fat bulges in those areas.
Cellulite is not on that list. The AAD places cryolipolysis, the method behind CoolSculpting, among the treatments it does not recommend for cellulite. Session counts, results timing and a rare side effect called paradoxical adipose hyperplasia are covered in our body contouring guide.
Is cavitation FDA-cleared?
"Cavitation" is a word on spa menus more than a device category. A search of the FDA's 510(k) database on October 29, 2026 found no device with cavitation in its name. Ultrasound devices that are cleared for fat, such as UltraShape, fall under the federal rule for focused ultrasound for aesthetic use, and UltraShape's 2014 clearance names one result: a smaller abdominal circumference.
If a provider offers cavitation, ask for the device brand and its 510(k) number, then check it yourself. In Florida, rule 61G5-18.00015 places ultrasound treatments beyond the scope of a cosmetology license.
Does Emsculpt help cellulite?
BTL's 2018 file describes its 799-2 device as one that produces an electromagnetic field that interacts with body tissue to stimulate muscle, to strengthen, tone and firm the abdomen, buttocks and thighs. Its wording is about muscle. It says nothing about cellulite or the skin surface.
Karisma has its own muscle session, EMS body sculpting (EMS Body Sculpting, $125), which is not sold as a cellulite treatment either. The device Kay uses is the EMSlim Neo.
Where Endermologie fits, and a client's VelaShape comparison
Endermologie is the only one of the four whose FDA wording is about cellulite, and that wording is careful: a temporary reduction in how it looks. Studies are small and mixed, as laid out in does Endermologie work for cellulite?, and the AAD notes cellulite tends to return within a month of stopping.
VelaShape is a fifth device people bring up. The FDA lists it, cleared in 2007, in the device class for vacuum massagers with light-induced heating. One Karisma client who had tried both compared the feel in her Google review, which you can read on the Endermologie page. Karisma does not offer VelaShape.
Which one matches your goal?
- Dimpled thighs or buttocks, for a season: Endermologie, with upkeep. Results are temporary and vary.
- A pocket of fat near your goal weight: a fat-reduction device at a physician-led practice. Not offered at Karisma.
- Softer abdominal or buttock muscles: a muscle device or strength training.
- Loose skin after pregnancy or weight loss: none of these four. Read postpartum body options.
- Pain, swelling or easy bruising in the legs: a physician first. See lipedema vs cellulite.
Questions people ask when comparing these
Is Endermologie better than CoolSculpting?
They are not built for the same job. CoolSculpting is cleared to break down fat in set areas. Endermologie is cleared to temporarily reduce how cellulite looks. Pick by the problem, not the brand.
Does CoolSculpting get rid of cellulite?
No. Its current FDA wording is about fat and fat bulges, and the AAD does not recommend cryolipolysis for cellulite.
Is cavitation FDA-cleared?
Some ultrasound fat devices are cleared, under their own brand names. We found no 510(k) for a device named cavitation. Ask any provider for the exact device and its 510(k) number.
Can Emsculpt help cellulite?
Its FDA wording is about muscle tone and firmness, not cellulite, and the AAD's cellulite summary does not include it. Stronger muscle can make skin look smoother, per the AAD, but that is a different goal.
- FDA 510(k) K990445, LPG Therapeutic Massager, summary and indications, decision January 18, 2000
- FDA 510(k) K233732, CoolSculpting Elite System, indications for use, decision September 12, 2024
- FDA database entry DEN090002, Zeltiq Aesthetics dermal cooling device, August 24, 2010
- FDA 510(k) K141708, UltraShape System, indications for use, decision October 6, 2014
- openFDA 510(k) search: device name "cavitation", no match on October 29, 2026
- FDA 510(k) K180813, BTL 799-2, summary and indications, decision June 14, 2018
- FDA 510(k) K182106, BTL 799-2T, indications, decision October 23, 2018
- BTL extends Emsculpt to the arms and legs, press release via BioSpace, July 16, 2019
- FDA 510(k) K071872, VelaShape, Syneron Medical, decision August 22, 2007
- Cellulite treatments: What really works?, American Academy of Dermatology, checked October 29, 2026
- Florida Administrative Code rule 61G5-18.00015, Cornell LII, checked October 29, 2026
